The chimp test is a spatial working-memory task. Numbers flash on a grid, then vanish, and you tap their positions in order. Your score is the largest count you can clear.
What the chimp test measures
This is a test of visuospatial working memory — your ability to briefly hold where things were and in what order. Numbers appear at random spots on a grid. After a moment they turn into blank tiles, and you must tap the positions in ascending numerical order from memory.
Each round that you clear adds one more number, so the grid grows more crowded and the memory load rises. Your score is the highest count you can reproduce correctly. It is important to be precise about what this measures: it is spatial memory span, not intelligence and not IQ. A strong score means you held a spatial pattern well for a few seconds. That is a specific, narrow skill.
The science: Inoue and Matsuzawa, 2007
The task comes from a study by Sana Inoue and Tetsuro Matsuzawa, published in Current Biology in 2007. Working at the Primate Research Institute in Japan, they trained chimpanzees on exactly this kind of number-and-position memory task and compared them with human adults.
Their most striking result involved a young chimpanzee named Ayumu. When numbers were shown for only a fraction of a second and then masked, Ayumu recalled their positions faster and more accurately than the human participants. The finding suggested that young chimpanzees can hold a brief spatial snapshot — a form of rapid working memory — that outperforms adult humans on this particular task.
The study is often described in terms of eidetic-like memory: the ability to take in a whole layout at a glance rather than reading it item by item. It is a memory result, not a claim about general intelligence, and the researchers framed it that way.
Typical scores and what they mean
Most adults reach a span of roughly N ≈ 7 to 9 before making a mistake, and then errors climb quickly. That range lines up with the classic limits of human working memory.
- Around 5–6 — a common first attempt, before you settle into a strategy.
- Around 7–9 — where most adults top out with a bit of practice.
- 10 or higher — above typical; usually reflects a deliberate strategy and focused practice.
These are memory bands, nothing more. A higher number here says you are good at this specific spatial task. It does not measure reasoning, knowledge, or any broad ability, and it should never be read as an IQ figure.
How to improve your span
Spatial memory span is partly trainable through strategy and attention, though the gains are modest and specific to the task.
- Grab the whole layout at once. Try to take a mental snapshot of every position before the numbers vanish, rather than reading them one by one.
- Chunk positions into small clusters — a pair here, a triangle there. Grouping reduces the number of separate items you carry.
- Anchor to the grid. Relating positions to corners, edges, and the center gives each one a stable reference.
- Reduce distraction. Working memory is fragile; a quiet moment and full attention help more than raw effort.
Be honest with yourself about limits. Practice smooths out mistakes and can nudge your span up a point or two, but it will not rewrite your basic memory capacity, and improvement on this task does not transfer to unrelated skills.
Common mistakes and what skews the score
Small habits change your result without reflecting real memory.
- Reading numbers sequentially instead of snapshotting the whole board runs out of time on larger rounds.
- Rushing the first tap before you have fixed the full pattern often collapses the whole sequence.
- Longer display times inflate the score. The task is much easier when numbers stay visible; the challenge is remembering after they vanish.
- Fatigue and distraction deflate it, because working memory drops sharply when your attention is split.
FAQ
- Is the chimp test an IQ test?
- No. It is a spatial working-memory task and nothing more. It measures how well you briefly hold positions and order on a grid. It does not measure intelligence, IQ, reasoning, or knowledge, and it should not be interpreted that way.
- Did a chimpanzee really beat humans at this?
- In the Inoue and Matsuzawa 2007 study, a young chimpanzee named Ayumu recalled the positions of briefly flashed numbers faster and more accurately than adult humans on this specific task. It is a memory result about one narrow skill, not a general comparison of intelligence.
- What score is normal?
- Most adults clear about 7 to 9 numbers before errors take over, which matches the usual limits of human working memory. Reaching 10 or more is above typical and usually reflects a deliberate strategy.
- Can I train myself to be better at it?
- Somewhat. Taking a mental snapshot of the whole grid, chunking positions into clusters, and staying focused can add a point or two. The gains are modest and specific to this task, and they do not transfer to unrelated abilities.